Here is the full feedback on the mocks, question by question:-
FEB MOCK: LIT: 40/75 B
FEB MOCK: LIT P3: OPEN BOOK 25/50 B
Q1: 13/25: no annotation of text; shows understanding of scene in context to whole play; details and insightful personal response; strengthen using more direct reference (cannot move to Band 4 without this); discuss more the way Miller uses language for effect
Q8: 12/25: good clear and focused introduction; good personal response but lacking in focus on language and references
FEB MOCK: LIT P3: UNSEEN 15/25 B
Q2: 15/25
some good understanding but metaphors are not interpreted fully; misses opportunities due to lack of annotation; needs to analyse the actual words a lot more deeply; has a good understanding but needs closer reference to the text to develop int o a more detailed response
FEB MOCK: LANG: 76/100 A*
FEB MOCK: LANG P2 EXT: 35/50 A
Q1: 17/20
A:13 B:4
Competent and sustained response; appropriate modification of passage; clear and sustained voice - though some 'slang' may not be appropriate for such a formal situation and I am not sure a police officer would sue such informal phrases in an interview with a superior; sustained use of supporting detail and developed with plenty of reference to the passage;
Q2: 6/10
Some good examples are identified and explained but this is done in a very general way, there is insufficient depth and detail in the analysis and there is not enough attempt to suggest the overall effects of the examples; quotation marks need to be used to show real understanding of how language works
Q3: 12/20
A:9 B:3
Some areas are great but the second section shows lack of focus; no real structure introduction or conclusion to link the sections
FEB MOCK: LANG P3: 41/50 A
Q1: 22/25
R: 9/10
W: 13/15
Great use of material showing understanding and interpretation; perhaps could work on developing more of a personal opinion; writing shows clear understanding of purpose and audience; wide range of vocabulary and strong sense of structure both within paragraphs and overall
Q2: 19/25 (argumentative)
A: 9/13
B: 10/12
Needs a more focused, clearer introduction; argument is repetitious at times; needs more concrete examples to make it stronger and more cohesive; fluent and largely accurate - more awareness of a sense of audience and a stronger overall structure would improve this
No comments:
Post a Comment