Chelsea fc

Friday, 1 March 2013

Missing work

Where is the reflection for your mock exam? Please use every opportunity to think and reflect on your work and improve your writing.

Here is the full feedback on the mocks, question by question:-


FEB MOCK: LIT: 40/75 B

FEB MOCK: LIT P3: OPEN BOOK  25/50 B
Q1: 13/25: no annotation of text; shows understanding of scene in context to whole play; details and insightful personal response; strengthen using more direct reference (cannot move to Band 4 without this); discuss more the way Miller uses language for effect
Q8: 12/25: good clear and focused introduction; good personal response but lacking in focus on language and references
FEB MOCK: LIT P3: UNSEEN  15/25 B
Q2: 15/25
some good understanding but metaphors are not interpreted fully; misses opportunities due to lack of annotation; needs to analyse the actual words a lot more deeply; has a good understanding but needs closer reference to the text to develop int o a more detailed response

FEB MOCK: LANG: 76/100 A*

FEB MOCK: LANG P2 EXT: 35/50 A
Q1: 17/20 
A:13 B:4
Competent and sustained response; appropriate modification of passage; clear and sustained voice - though some 'slang' may not be appropriate for such a formal situation and I am not sure a police officer would sue such informal phrases in an interview with a superior; sustained use of supporting detail and developed with plenty of reference to the passage; 
Q2: 6/10
Some good examples are identified and explained but this is done in a very general way, there is insufficient depth and detail in the analysis and there is not enough attempt to suggest the overall effects of the examples; quotation marks need to be used to show real understanding of how language works
Q3: 12/20
A:9 B:3
Some areas are great but the second section shows lack of focus; no real structure introduction or conclusion to link the sections

FEB MOCK: LANG P3: 41/50 A
Q1: 22/25
R: 9/10
W: 13/15
Great use of material showing understanding and interpretation; perhaps could work on developing more of a personal opinion; writing shows clear understanding of purpose and audience; wide range of vocabulary and strong sense of structure both within paragraphs and overall
Q2: 19/25 (argumentative)
A: 9/13
B: 10/12
Needs a more focused, clearer introduction; argument is repetitious at times; needs more concrete examples to make it stronger and more cohesive; fluent and largely accurate - more awareness of a sense of audience and a stronger overall structure would improve this

No comments:

Post a Comment